The Muse Marquee

Home
Marquee Blog
Meet the Editors
Awards
Contests
Poppacrit's Den
Mother Hen's Bin
Muselings
Up From Down Under
Worlds Apart
Between Writer and Pen
October 2009 Flashers
Flashers Archives
Poets Corner
POETRY Archives
Marquee E-Book Shop
Interview Archives
FREEBIES
Marquee Bookstore
Markets
The Muse Marquee Ad Rates
Advertisers Links
Helpful Links
Guidelines

Between Writer and Pen

dawnjohnsona.jpg

Editor

Dawn Boeder Johnson

celticmind60@yahoo.com

 

 

What You Write

Part one: Literary Fiction

 

So, you want to write fiction, eh? And just how are you gonna feed yourself while you…oh, wait…this isn’t the Fiction Writers Starve lecture. That was last week from your mother. This is about what kind of fiction you’re writing while you’re starving.

 

Did you realize what you write is just as critical as how well you write? (It is, especially if you want to make a buck at it.) You have two major choices, mainstream or literary fiction, and a third option you probably never considered.

 

We’ll get to that third choice eventually; for now, let’s look at literary fiction.

 

According to that (seemingly) omniscient Oz of the Internet, Wikipedia, “Literary fiction is a term that has come into common usage since around 1970, principally to distinguish serious fiction (that is, work with claims to literary merit) from the many types of  genre fiction and popular fiction …. In broad terms, literary fiction focuses more on style, psychological depth, and character, whereas mainstream commercial fiction (the page-turner) focuses more on  narrative and  plot.”

 

Huh?

 

Let’s break that down, shall we? Several characteristics of literary fiction help explain things further. For one, literary fiction uses complex themes or ideas; many times these are universal and deal with life’s truths or human nature.  Themes give literary fiction meat—take it beyond mere story with a subtle message that unifies the writing. That may sound snooty, but it’s not. Literary works invite reflection and create an emotional charge for the reader—positive or negative—that broadens his take on the human experience. If I were going to compare this type of writing to music or dance, I’d pick the waltz—slow, measured, sweeping, and smooth.

 

Literary fiction is also more about form than plot. Sure, it always has a plot, but it takes a back seat to exploring the characters and their personal failings or triumphs. Are the good guys entirely virtuous and above reproach? Rarely. Are the bad guys truly bad, superficially warped by society, or just woefully misunderstood? Often, the reader must decide. Literary fiction represents an intricate view of life, fluid and sometimes indistinct, where black comes in shades from jet to cloud gray, and white is frequently tainted with baby poop yellow. The writing is what I’d call gorgeous, rich with descriptions—metaphors are a must. (As are probing monologues by pensive characters immersed in internal—and often moral—conflicts.) Both protagonists and antagonists battle anxieties and shortcomings, baring their souls and second-guessing nearly everything. Even story endings may have an ambivalent quality, making readers fill in the blanks about whether the protagonist ends up rosy-cheeked or suicidal.

 

Familiar names from the early 20th century exemplify the literary style, Hemingway, Steinbeck, and Fitzgerald among them. In The Grapes of Wrath, Steinbeck masterfully paints a picture of the downtrodden Dust Bowl farmers during the Great Depression, examining their mistakes, misfortunes, desires, and triumphs. The work is character-centric. Everyone’s got a major flaw, and they’re not afraid to flaunt them for the reader.

 

These days, many consider literary writing a difficult challenge, and still others consider reading it to be one too. When we look at 19th-century works and much early 20th, the style can seem dated and heavy. It’s more verbose, tends to stray from the plot for long stretches (often to indulge the characters), and incorporates the author’s commentary on larger issues—society, environment, politics, etc. The language, however, tends to be rich, artful, and vivid, drawing you into time and place and emotion.  Fortunately, contemporary literary works are less extreme in these regards and can be characterized as more modern-reader friendly. John Updike is sometimes considered a literary author, and he achieved exceptional literary and commercial acclaim in his lifetime. His prose style has been called inimitable and his rich descriptions and language compared to the work of Proust and Nabokov. At the same time, his “common man” characters reach out to many, reinforcing the assertion that it’s possible to write extraordinarily about the ordinary.

 

If you’ve enjoyed this waltz with literary fiction, I hope you’ll pop back in next month for our disco with mainstream (or genre) fiction. Put on your white suit or halter dress and I’ll meet you under the spinning lights in the November issue!

 

 

Bibliography:
Paszkowski, Janet, Defining Artless Fiction: 24 Basic Differences Between Literary & Mainstream/Genre Writing. AbsoluteWrite.com http://www.absolutewrite.com/specialty_writing/artless_fiction.htm

 

Rosenfeld, Jordan E., Confessions of a Plot Junkie. Writer’s Digest, July/August 2009, page 12.

 

Wikipedia, www.wikipedia.org, entries for Literary fiction and Genre fiction and John Updike.

 

 

Dawn

Between Writer and Pen  - October 2009

ARCHIVE